Skip to main content
| The CEP | C.E.P. News

House of Lords Constitution Committee sits and is taking evidence from the organisations

Today, Wednesday 4 November the House of Lords Constitution Committee sits and is taking evidence from the organisations. You will notice that the Campaign for an English Parliament once again finds its excluded from giving oral evidence. I ask you to ponder why that is? We have given oral evidence before on two occasions and we have entered written evidence this time. Why have we been excluded? Is it because the Lords realise that the establishment of English Parliament is the only solution to the English Question and are unwilling to include this option because it will highlight that they also have Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish Peers implementing laws on England? Or Is it because a National Federal system will mean that the Lords will be dissolved for a Senate style body and they are intent on blocking a fair democratic solution to the English Question? Please decide between the two questions or you might decide that both are right All the Best Scilla Cullen If you want to read our written evidence then please go to this link https://thecepreview.wordpress.com/2015/10/13/the-ceps-written-evidence-to-the-constitution-committee/ The Link http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/news-parliament-2015/thinktanks-4nov/ Academics and think tanks give evidence on Union and devolution 03 November 2015 On Wednesday 4 November the House of Lords Constitution Committee hears evidence from constitutional academics and think tank directors as part of its inquiry into the Union and devolution. Witnesses At 10.30am the Committee hears from:
  • Professor John Curtice, Strathclyde University
  • Dr Jan Eichhorn, University of Edinburgh
At 11.30am the Committee hears from:
  • Alexandra Runswick, Director, Unlock Democracy
  • Brendan Donnelly, Director, Federal Trust for Education and Research
Possible questions In the first session, questions will focus on how the Union was perceived in Scotland during the independence referendum; how support for the Union differs across the four nations of the UK; and how far the public are prepared to accept different levels of taxation and services in different parts of the UK. In the second session, the Committee will ask the witnesses whether legislative devolution to or within England is necessary to deliver a settled constitutional settlement; what impact English Votes for English Laws might have on the Union; and whether decentralisation as envisaged in the City and Local Government Devolution Bill might answer the 'English question'.

House of Lords Constitution Committee sits and is taking evidence from the organisations

Support Our Campaign

The Celtic nations want independence

The Celtic nations want independence

| The CEP | News
Andy Burnham’s Devolution Plans Will Break England Apart

Andy Burnham’s Devolution Plans Will Break England Apart

| The CEP | News
Why Does England Need an English Parliament?

Why Does England Need an English Parliament?

| The CEP | News
A New Website for the Campaign for an English Parliament

A New Website for the Campaign for an English Parliament

| The CEP | News
England calls for a day of celebrations

England calls for a day of celebrations.

| The CEP | News
Manifesto Commitments and Democratic Trust

Manifesto Commitments and Democratic Trust

| The CEP | C.E.P. News
Devolution Must Flow from an English Parliament, Not Replace It

Devolution Must Flow from an English Parliament, Not Replace It

| The CEP | C.E.P. News
More Power to English Counties, Not Government Quangos

More Power to English Counties, Not Government Quangos

| The CEP | C.E.P. News
Recognising England: The Case for a National Day

Recognising England: The Case for a National Day

| The CEP | C.E.P. News
The changing face of politics across Europe.

The changing face of politics across Europe.

| The CEP | C.E.P. News